



Radio JenaSingle Channel Projection with sound
Duration: 4 minute 45 seconds
2009
Exhibited first at Bose Pacia, New York at the group show On Certainty, curated by Rit Premnath
KEYWORDS
+ G.W.F. Haeckel as the hypothetical hybrid of the philosopher and the naturalist
+ Hegel as the philosopher of teleology - History as the grand march of Reason
+ Haeckel’s obsession in locating ‘development’ in Darwinian evolution.
+ History written in/on the body or “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny’
+ ‘Nazi’ evolution and creationist ‘science’: the difficulties of judging historical guilt
+ The Knowledge of Yoga: German Romantics and their Orientalist construction of a ‘spiritual’ India
First, let us look at some dates.
1831: In the winter of this year, while G.W.F. Hegel dies from cholera in the midst of delivering another version of his lectures that were later compiled as The Philosophy of History, the young Charles Darwin sets sail on a British surveying ship, HMS Beagle.
1859: Darwin publishes Origin of Species. In the same year, Friedrich Max Mueller, an Indologist chiefly remembered today as a ‘sympathetic’ interpreter of the spiritual glories of Indian civilisation, publishes A History of Ancient Indian Literature. This comprehensive survey of available information on the Vedic period was an instant success, generating multiple editions in close succession.
As we scan these parallel events, we should remind ourselves that such a presentation of synchronicity is never an innocent survey of facts and always seem to imply a hidden causality. Hovering between factuality and imagination, is it in the nature of such hidden causalities that they insist on their translucence? Could we say that this translucence – perhaps a kind of foggy visibility - produces a reality that can always be contested but never conclusively falsified?
In juxtaposing two different, but potentially related, strands of historical context, Radio Jena attempts to reflect on the nature of historical causality. Our radio correspondent in this work, G.W.F. Haeckel is a hypothetical hybrid of the philosopher G.W.F. Hegel and the influential mid nineteenth century naturalist and Darwinian ‘evangelist’ Ernst Haeckel. Radio Jena too is a fictive radio station, which nonetheless tries to foreground the importance of the city of Jena as an early hub of German Romantic thought. Although it was in Berlin that Hegel became a celebrity, he was based in Jena at one point, and for Haeckel, Jena was the city where he lived and worked for all his life.
The quotations from Hegel’s The Philosophy of History that are interspersed within the frames of Radio Jena are however real and untarnished by any imaginative intervention. Hegel, as we all know, is famous as the philosopher of teleology: he made ‘purposeful development’ one of the cornerstones of his philosophical system that was built around the notion of the grand march of History and Reason through increasingly developed states. This spectre of teleology casts its long shadow over Haeckel too, and in a very significant way.
While his enthusiastic championing of Darwinian evolution was an important factor in securing an increased public visibility for the radically new theory, Hackel laid far more emphasis on a certain anthropocentric idea of development in his interpretation of Darwin. While he asserted the validity of evolutionary mechanisms like variation and natural selection, evolution for Haeckel was also about the trajectory of development in the natural world – the grand march from amoeba to man. Today however, with the benefit of hindsight, we could possibly express our reservations about the supposed universality of this Haeckelian “man”.
Haeckel’s popular and controversial “biogenetic law” postulated that ‘the embryo of an advanced creature recapitulates the same morphological stages that the phylum went through in its evolutionary descent.’ According to this law, a human embryo, starts life as a simple single celled entity and then climbs through a succession of increasingly complex forms, each resembling the embryo of organisms that are correspondingly higher up the evolutionary tree: fish, salamander, tortoise, chick, pig, calf, rabbit and finally human.
Now, although it is an established fact that Haeckel’s theories were actively used by the Nazis to rationalise their own ghastly fascination with eugenics, in our present context, where the new anti-Darwinists, the proponents of creationist and Intelligent Design deliberately obfuscate the boundaries of science and non-science to significant public harm, we should be more nuanced in pronouncing our verdict of historical guilt. Contemporary Creationist and Intelligent Design literature routinely pick on Hackel’s indirect (or perhaps not so indirect?) connection with fascist Germany to ‘expose’ the dangerous moral darkness that infects the Darwinian evolutionary paradigm, while simultaneously glossing over their own alliance with fundamentalist politics.
In India, Hindu fundamentalists have been involved in popularising their own brand of chauvinist obfuscation. In their spurious conception of a monolithic, and non-syncretic ‘Hindu’ civilisation, cultural practices like Yoga, take on the mantle of a hallowed civilisational ‘tradition’. The fact that the contemporary form of Yoga, and the larger cultural discourse in which it is often invoked, including its increased global visibility, have more to do with the Orientalist legacy of the colonial encounter, than with any supposed authenticity of an unchanging tradition, is of course conveniently forgotten. The consolidated Hinduism, which emerged as a result of this colonial encounter, was actually significantly influenced by the German Romantic movement and its obsession in graphing a civilisational teleology for Europe. In their enthusiasm for the ‘Aryan antiquity’ of India as a potential source for a second ‘Renaissance’ of European thought, philosophers and philologists like J.G. Herder, Friedrich Schlegel and later Friedrich Max Mueller, were all involved in the Orientalist construction of Indian civilisation as the spiritual childhood of Europe.
Cultural constructs however have an uncanny longevity. Therefore it comes as no surprise that the stereotype of ‘spiritual’ India still enjoys a wide currency and gets routinely deployed, not only by Hindu fundamentalists but also by the flickering confections crafted by the global entertainment machine.























































